Two proposed solutions (in very brief).
Why it is defective, and what a good alternative might be.
Do unobservables actually exist? (A riddle. Let the reader understand.)
How science and philosophy seek to answer questions.
The demarcation problem, fuzzy lines, and mild discomfort.
Different sciences, different methodologies, different "laws."
Exactness, explanatory power, causality, and meaning in science.
The limits of Aristotelian science (and why Kuhn might be exaggerating a bit).
Biology and physics are different in more ways than one.
Even when two claims yield the same prediction, their truth content matters.
Physicalism is not and cannot be a consequence of science.
A key debate in the philosophy of science (with interesting implications for young-earth creationism).
Against an argument which isn't even coherent, much less a defeater.
The physical constants of the universe give us good reason to think God exists.
Inductive and deductive arguments are not the only ways to form rational, well-warranted beliefs.